The Indexa analytics platform gives legal professionals cutting-edge search and integration of law information. From researching a judge, to connecting court rulings, to mining legal information through media — Indexa surfaces trends, patterns, and the information that matters most. Four sub-products power it: Indexation, Analytic, Crawler, and Legal Insight.
Each information source is classified, tokenized, and clustered — then connected, so legal insight emerges from the relationships between data, not just the documents themselves.
Raw legal information — court decisions, regulations, scholarship — classified, tokenized, and clustered into structured records. The substrate everything else is built on: messy source documents turned into queryable data.
Find correlation between each case and other cases and regulation. Trends in judge consideration, the recurring material in trials, and verdict patterns within case clusters — surfaced as analytics, not buried in documents.
A crawling engine that gathers information from multiple sources at once. Each crawl extracts content and documents into one place — pulling not only legal information but also signal from media and social media.
Legal insight ammunition for professionals to develop the most informative legal opinion for a client. Connections between each piece of legal information, regulation links, and predictive information of a case using data gathering.
Extract data to make reports and insight from each legal document or other information source. The bridge from the corpus to a deliverable — at the volume that ministry archives actually hold.
Change the perspective of information with engaging visualization. Advanced visualization using GIS and D3 — maps and interactive charts that give more meaning to the data, displayed interactively for the user.
Indonesian regulation is a directed graph — but until we built it, no one had assembled it. Our citation graph resolves cross-references across the entire corpus: which Acts a regulation derives its authority from, which lower instruments implement it, which provisions have been amended by later law, which have been struck by the Constitutional Court.
For policy analysts and AI builders, this is the substrate that turns "regulatory text" into "regulatory knowledge."
One of Indonesia's hardest regulatory problems is also one of its quietest: the same term, defined differently in different laws, applied inconsistently across ministries. We built an ML-powered diff engine that surfaces these definitional drifts term by term, version by version.
For Indexa's own drafters, this is how we avoid creating the nineteenth conflicting definition. For our clients, this is how a research team or a compliance system can finally see — at a glance — which definition is currently in force, which is superseded, and what changed.
A court decision is rarely useful in PDF form. We have built an NLP pipeline that reads decisions and writes back structured data: applied articles, sentence length, financial losses, defendant attributes, geographic origin, and the legal principle itself.
For the Attorney General's Office, 50,000 narcotic cases became the baseline data set for the Narcotic Requisitor Calculator — analytics that put structure around requisitor decisions and monitoring. The same pipeline powers Indexa Analytic, and is available to apply to your own research question.
A five-stage pipeline, running continuously. Every regulation in our corpus has a clear chain of custody: source URL, capture timestamp, parser version, classification confidence, and reconciliation status.
Distributed crawlers monitor multiple government portals and ministry sub-sites, plus media and social-media sources — pulling new instruments and signal into one place.
OCR for scanned gazettes, structured-document parsing for native digital. Layout-aware extraction preserves bab, pasal, ayat hierarchy.
NLP classifier assigns regulation tier, subject domain, issuing authority. Confidence scores expose ambiguous cases for human review.
Cross-references in "mengingat" and "menetapkan" clauses resolved to graph edges. Definitions extracted from Pasal 1 and diffed against prior versions.
Elasticsearch index, REST API, GraphQL endpoint, and bulk-export JSON/CSV. Versioned snapshots for reproducible research.
Internal regulatory inventory, policy harmonisation across line ministries, regulatory impact assessment, and AI/RAG pilots over the agency's own legal corpus. Custom slices and on-premise deployments available.
Quantitative legal scholarship, comparative law studies, longitudinal sentence-disparity research, regulatory-network analysis. Reproducible snapshots with stable identifiers for citation.
Foundation data for compliance platforms, contract review tools, case research products, and LLM-based legal copilots. API access with attribution and rate tiers calibrated to your product.
The public-facing search interface — Pencari Informasi Putusan and Pencari Kesamaan Putusan. Search legal information, regulation, and court decisions with one swipe.
The full analytics platform for legal professionals — case correlation, judge research, trend and pattern surfacing, and predictive information drawn from the integrated corpus.
Bespoke data extraction, classification pipelines, and thematic analysis built around an institution's research question — as in the AGO narcotic requisitor baseline. Suited to ministries and research partners.
The seven-tier hierarchy of Indonesian legislation (UU 12/2011), plus agency regulations, regional Perda, and court decisions — the structure Indexa indexes and integrates against.
Every record carries its source URL and capture timestamp. We do not redact, edit, or paraphrase regulatory or judicial text — what you query is what the gazette published.
For case law, personal identifiers in decisions follow the Supreme Court's own publication policy. Our pipelines respect anonimisasi conventions, and we provide tools for additional redaction where research ethics require it.
Tell us what you're trying to query, and we'll tell you how the platform fits — and what additional analysis might be worth commissioning.
Custom data extraction, classification pipelines, and thematic analysis built around your own legal corpus and research question.
Gedung Setiabudi 2, Lantai 2, Suite 207 B-C
Jl. H. R. Rasuna Said Kav. 62
Kuningan, Jakarta